|
Web browsing
|
| ||||||||||
 | browser benchmark | 1 544 ms | vs | 25 851 ms | The Lumia 800 has a fairly fast web browser, but the Omnia W is slow | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| adobe flash support | No | vs | No | Neither supports Adobe Flash | ||||||
Sensors
|
| ||||||||||
| gps | Assisted GPS | vs | Assisted GPS | Have assisted GPS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| accelerometer | Yes | vs | Yes | Both include an accelerometer | ||||||
| compass | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have integrated compasses | ||||||
| gyroscope | No | vs | Yes | |||||||
Storage
|
| ||||||||||
| memory card | None | vs | None | Neither has a memory card slot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| internal storage | 16 GB | vs | 7,8 GB | The Lumia 800's has an average amount of internal storage for storing music, photos and movies, but the Omnia W is below average | ||||||
Size
|
| ||||||||||
| weight | 142 g | vs | 115 g | The Omnia W is quite light, but the Lumia 800 is heavier | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| thickness | 12 mm | vs | 11 mm | The Omnia W is thin, while the Lumia 800 is just average thickness | ||||||
| size | 61x116x12 mm | vs | 58x116x10 mm | The Omnia W is fairly small, but the Lumia 800 is not far behind | ||||||
| waterproof | No | vs | No | Neither are waterproof | ||||||
Screen
|
| ||||||||||
| screen size | 3,7" | vs | 3,7" | Average sized screens | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| screen resolution | 800x480 | vs | 800x480 | Average screen resolution | ||||||
| screen ppi | 252 PPI | vs | 251 PPI | Average display of text, images and video | ||||||
| screen type | AMOLED | vs | Super AMOLED | The Omnia W has a Super AMOLED screen which is even more vivid, the Lumia 800 doesn't | ||||||
| touchscreen type | Capacitive | vs | Capacitive | Touchscreen | ||||||
Network
|
| ||||||||||
| network | HSDPA (7,2 mbps) | vs | HSDPA (7,2 mbps) | Average data speeds | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| generation | 3.5G | vs | 3.5G | Standard network technology | ||||||
| download speed | 3,74 mbps | vs | 0,96 mbps | The Lumia 800 has average actual download speeds, but the Omnia W's is slow | ||||||
| upload speed | 2,03 mbps | vs | 0,34 mbps | The Lumia 800 has fast actual upload speeds, but the Omnia W is slow | ||||||
| network latency | 97 ms | vs | 185 ms | Average network latencies | ||||||
| wifi | 802.11n (150 mbps) | vs | 802.11n (150 mbps) | Average wifi speed | ||||||
| wifi hotspot | No | vs | Yes | The Omnia W has a wifi hotspot to share it's Internet connection with other wifi devices | ||||||
| nfc | No | vs | No | Neither support NFC for wireless transactions | ||||||
| bluetooth | 2,1 | vs | 2,1 | Average bluetooth support | ||||||
Photo & Video
|
| ||||||||||
| camera | 8 MP | vs | 5 MP | They both have cameras | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| flash | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have camera flashes | ||||||
| secondary camera | Unknown | vs | 0,3 MP | |||||||
| movie format | 720p @ 30fps | vs | 720p @ 30fps | Both shoot high resolution HD movies | ||||||
| video out | None | vs | None | Neither have video output to connect to TVs etc | ||||||
Processing power
|
| ||||||||||
| frequency | 1,4 GHz | vs | 1,4 GHz | Powerful processors, very snappy and responsive | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| number of cores | Single core | vs | Single core | Both have single core cpus which is about the average | ||||||
| ram | 512 MB | vs | 512 MB | Average amount of RAM for running apps | ||||||
Battery
|
| ||||||||||
| talk time | 9,5 hours | vs | 7 hours | The Lumia 800 has good talk time, but the Omnia W is average | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| standby time | 14 days | vs | 20,4 days | Average standby time | ||||||
| battery capacity | 1 450 mAh | vs | 1 500 mAh | Average capacity batteries | ||||||
| technology | Lithium Ion | vs | Lithium Ion | |||||||
Keyboard & keypad
|
| ||||||||||
| numeric keypad | None | vs | None | Neither has a numeric keypad | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| keyboard | None | vs | None | Neither has a physical keyboard | ||||||
Music
|
| ||||||||||
| fm radio | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have built in FM radios to listen to news and music from FM stations | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| fm transmitter | No | vs | No | Neither have built-in FM transmitters | ||||||
| headphone jack | 3.5 mm | vs | 3.5 mm | Both have a headphone jack | ||||||
No comments:
Post a Comment
you got a comment